Strategies for Introducing the Speech.
A complete consideration of the use of anecdotes
and examples can be found in the section on evidence. All of those rules apply to employing
them as introductory devices.
In addition, keep in mind:
- Do not let your introductory example overwhelm
the speech. If it takes a long time to develop
the story, begin it in the intro, then develop each new episode as it relates to the idea you are
discussing.
- Make sure the introductory device concretely
and significantly speaks to the
overall topic of the speech. Don't just stick a
good story on the beginning, because it's a good story,
then make some flimsy transition to the body. The
audience will spot that as a gimmick, and your ethos will suffer. The narrative needs to
be illustrative of the case you are making to be a
justifiable introductory device.
- Start with the story. Don't wander into
it with a long-winded discussion of the topic. Just say:
"I'd like to tell you about John." or
"Last year, while I was hiking in the Great Smokey
Mountains . . ." Don't say: "I'd like to begin
with an opening example."

Whenever you elect to put content in your
speech, you have to ask yourself whether its potential for
helping you realize the specific speech purpose is worth the risk
of its potential for damaging your presentation. At the basic
public speaking level, asking the audience members a question
that you want them overtly to answer (e.g. "How many of you
. . .?" "Who here has . . . ?" etc.) is almost
never worth the risk--and hence should be avoided.
Well, I'll tell you why. Audience members
have a universally annoying tendency with regard to being asked
questions by a speaker. They tend to answer them!
"But," you say, "that is a good thing. It shows
that they are paying attention. It engages them emotionally? It
makes the speech about them. You said those were good
things to do."
Yes, I did. That will teach you to listen
to me. You are right. Up to the point of the response, asking a
question may do all of those things. But at the moment you get
the response, the chemistry is likely to go terribly wrong,
because the audience--assuming that you asked them a question
becuase you needed the answer--will expect you to incorporate the
answer you get into the speech immediately. They expect
you to have needed it to go on. That means you have to be
spontaneously able to do one of three things:
I doubt that you feel comfortable with
any of those options, so why not just eliminate the necessity to
employ one of them by not asking the question in the
first place!
A rhetorical question is designed to
stimulate thought and imagination, rather than an overt response.
You employ it to make the audience member mull over a
circumstance or search his or her memory.
I used to ask my students the question:
It is obviously not a Yes or No question.
It is meant to influence the audience member to dig back into his
or her history--to cycle through Christmases past in an attempt
to conjure an image that will inform the inquiry.
Using this device, I have still
accomplished all of the ends you had hoped to accomplishwith a
more directed question like: "How many
of you had a close relative die during the Christmas
holiday?"--showing that they are paying attention,
engaging them emotionally, and making the speech about
them--without risking the downside of having the audience
members' response blow up in my face.
- Get to the point.
Keep it simple and direct. The audience members should be
concentrating on answering it, not on what you meant by
asking it in the first place.
- Make sure it is directly
relevant to the speech, and not just a cheap
gimmick to get the audience members' attention. Nobody
likes to be taken advantage of. Any concentration of
attention you get will be more than offset by the bad
feelings it will engender what the ruse becomes obvious.
- Combining a rhetorical
question with a hypothetical
example is often a good strategy.
Start by establishing the narrative, then tie the
audience to it be extracting some sort of
reaction--"What would you think?"
"How would you respond?" etc.
- Discuss the issue raised by the question.
Reflect on the range of possible answers. For instance,
when I asked the question about Christmas, I knew that
the only likely available categories of response were:
- the listener had a really bad Christmas and was
immediately reminded of it.
- the listener was thinking back to what could be
considered relatively petty reasons for thinking
a given Christmas was bad--got the wrong thing,
didn't get enough, got stuck in the airport, etc.
- the listener couldn't really think of one,
because thankfully Christmas had treated him or
her pretty well down through the years.
Then I told the story of the kids in the terminal care
ward for which I was soliciting the donation of toys (the
point of the speech). As I narrated individual stories,
the audience members would compare their scenarios to the
one I laid out, and either empathize or feel a little
guilty. In either case, their own experience would
provide evidence to support my argument. This is the
ideal situation for a speaker to be in, and the creative
use of a Rhetorical Question facilitates
it.
Let's face it, you and I could eat our Funk
and Wagnell's for breakfast every day and still never
regurgitate anything close to profound enough to make it into Bartlett's.
So what is a poor beginning speaker to do?
What you do is borrow eloquence from somebody else--somebody
like Lord Chesterfield who has the gift to say what we want to
say more eloquently than we could ever hope to. That is the
service the use of an opening quotation
provides. It allows you to co-opt the eloquence of a
gifted communicator and link it to your message, with
hope that the ethos of the speaker will at least buy you the time
to establish an ethos of your own.
When opening with a quotation:
- Clearly bracket the quotation. The
biggest risk you run when using a quotation to open your
speech is that the audience member will fail to realize
when the quote is over and you are being you again. This
lack of clarity is disconcerting for the audience member
and can easily be avoided, if you just:
- Keep it Short. One or two
sentences maximum should be the guideline. If you
need any more than that the economy of language
that makes it an asset is missing anyway.
- Clearly label it a quotation. Do
this before you say it. Don't say, "I'd like
to start with a quote." or anything quite so
artificial. Just say, "A great write once
said . . . ." or " Dorothy Parker put
it best when she said . . . ." This is
always a good idea unless you are sure
that all of the audience members will know
that the quote is a quote. Then you can lead with
the quote and follow with the source.
- Use overt Signposting
to Delineate the beginning and end of the quote.
Don't stick your fingers in the air and make
those little quotation marks, but somewhere in
the vast gulf between doing that and doing
nothing lies the balance you need to strike. As
always, err on the side of clarity.
- Make sure the quote is Directly Relevant to the
subject. This means that the spirit as well as
the content of the quote should resonate with your topic.
"I think that I shall
never see a thing as lovely as a tree. Today, I'd like to
offer a vigorous defense of clear-cut lumbering."
I'm going to take flyer and guess that clear-cut
lumbering isn't what Joyce Kilmer had in minds when she
wrote the
poem. Again, you are using the quote because it
clarifies the essence of your intended message. If it
doesn't . . . well . . . Dorothy Parker put it best when
she said " Wit has truth in it; wise-cracking is
simply calisthentics with words."
- Avoid Elongated Recitations of Poetry.
If you don't believe me, ask William
Shatner. Suffice to say that about six lines into "Do
Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night" most of your
audience will be volunteering to.
Sometimes, the best device is no device.
Sometimes the relevance of the subject for the audience--the
predictability of their interest--is so overt that the best
choice for the speaker is just to state as directly as possible
what the speech is about. I had a student once who was a Wall Street investment manager.
He started his speech by saying:
"Tonight, I'm going to tell you
all how to get rich."
Having said that, the speaker could be pretty sure
that--excepting those who had sworn the vow of poverty (and
anyone that spiritual would be polite enough to listen
anyway)--everyone would be tuned into the first of his main
ideas. Wasting valuable time with quotations or examples would
not, in this case, have been a good strategic choice.
When opening with a direct statement of relevance:
- Make sure the relevance of your topic is, in
fact, obvious. Far too many student-speakers
claim to be employing this device when they have really
just failed to create a good conclusion. Direct statement
is not No Device. It should only be used when, as
in the example above, you are sure your audience
will be amenable to the subject.
- Make sure your tone matches your content.
If the subject matter is supposed to be overtly
compelling to us, it needs to be communicated as overtly
compelling to you. Nonverbal confidence and gravity are
necessary to the effective use of this device.
- Think of a couple of alternative opening
strategies anyway. What seems obviously
compelling in the planning stage may not seem so
compelling when you actually go to deliver the speech. It
cannot hurt to have a spare introduction or two in
case--having met your audience--you think you need the
additional boost.
If the reason for your speech is tied to
some event, occasion, or institution, the audience members can be
counted on to bring with them a serious expectation to hear you
tie the subject of the speech to that event or institution. So
just do it. Why not? There is bound to be a set of ideals or
abstractions with which the group identifies; imbuing your
content with those abstractions will make the audience members
feel as though they have had that impact on you. How can that
hurt?
At the same time, don't be
constrained by the event or institution. We have all
heard enough debilitating commencement addresses to know what
happens what the speaker's attendance to expectations of the
audience becomes slavish. Consider the occasion a starting
point, nothing else.
Bookending is the application of the
introductory device to the conclusion. If you open with
a story, close with it. The same goes for a quotation, a
rhetorical question or any other device.
Bookending is effective, because it provides
a nice psychological closure for the audience--a sense that they
have come full circle back to the beginning. Imagine that the
speech is like a roller coaster. How disconcerting would it be if
you got on the roller coaster in one part of the park, then it
took you halfway across the lot and dropped you off. Instead, the
attendant ushers you on, you sit down, you get banged around for
a couple of minutes, then you stumble out just a few feet from
where you got in. Then off you go with the rest of your
life--wiser for the experience!
The amusement ride is a good analogy to the
speech. You grab the audience members as they sidle through life,
take them on a ride, then drop them back where you found them.
Bookending is a clear signpost
that the end is near.
When closing with a bookend:
- Try to make clear how the content of the body of
the speech has informed the device with which you
started. Our perception of the device should be
fuller, more appreciative in some way, because we heard
your speech. If you started with a story, you can resolve
it or give it a happier ending. If you started with a
quote, point out how much more in touch we are with its
eloquence than the first time we heard it. etc.
Return to Virtual Clarity.