|
POL 101
Politics: Comparative
Introduction
Course
description (see also Catalog)
Democratic and authoritarian states are compared and
contrasted from viewpoints of politicians, citizens, journalists, and political
scientists. Human relations and
behaviors—public and otherwise—are analyzed with reference to how
individuals and groups experience power.
Text: Robert J. Jackson & Doreen Jackson, A Comparative Introduction to Political Science (Prentice-Hall,
1997).
Reading
lists are printed with each chapter.
Supplementary material is to be collected by each student from
current news sources and is to be organized in clippings files: interesting
countries, important persons, hot issues. Suggested
sources are The New York Times, The
Economist.
An outstanding news
source online is <www.bbc.co.uk>
Lexicon
is available in paper copy at Library Reserve desk, on Blackboard for registered
students, and in Political Science office for copying onto 3½” diskette.
Schedule
|
Day/Week
|
Text
|
Topic (read text before and after)
|
Written Items
|
|
Day
1
|
ch
1
|
Purpose,
Definitions, Scope & Limits
|
|
|
Day
2
|
ch
2
|
Political
Science
|
|
|
Week
2
|
3,
4
|
The
Modern State, States & Forms
|
|
|
Day
5
|
5
|
Democratic/Authoritarian
distinctions
|
|
Day
6
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Week
4
|
ch
6
|
Culture,
Socialization
|
#1
due/do
|
|
Week
5
|
ch
7
|
Democratic/Authoritarian
|
|
|
Week
6
|
8,
9
|
Ideologies,
Dem/Auth
|
|
|
Week
7
|
10,
11
|
Constitutions,
Dem/Auth
|
#2
due/do
|
|
Week
8
|
12,
13
|
Central
Government, D/A
|
WD
w/o permission
|
|
Week
9
|
14,
15
|
Public
Administration, D/A
|
WD
w/ permission
|
|
Week
10
|
16,
17
|
Parties
& Interests, D/A
|
#3
due/do
|
|
Week
11
|
18,
19
|
Elections
& Voting, D/A
|
|
|
Week
12
|
ch
20
|
Change
|
|
|
Week
13
|
ch
21
|
Politics
among States
|
#4
due/do
|
|
Final
|
|
See
schedule when issued
|
|
Attendance
and punctuality are important. Delinquencies
are penalized.
Grading
of written work weighs three (3) written items equally.
Projects are due on dates indicated and are unacceptable after graded
papers are returned. Graded papers
are normally returned and discussed at the next class meeting.
Each paper must be collected by the author in order to get full value for
the grade. Consultation among
students and helping each other is fine on projects #1 and #2, although
individual papers should be submitted. Collaboration
is encouraged on projects #3 and #4—multiplying the number of cases compared
by the number of authors. If all
four (4) items are done, the lowest grade is omitted from computation.
One item can be skipped entirely without penalty.
A reduction is taken per missing item fewer than four.
Any “due” date might be converted into a “do” date, to be done
during class, in which case the work done on the project will have served as
test preparation.
Selected Sources
Almond, Gabriel A., and G.
Bingham Powell, Comparative Politics:
A Developmental Approach (Boston: Little, Brown, 1966).
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba, The
Civic Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1963).
Crick, Bernard, The American Science of
Politics (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1959).
Dahl, Robert A., Modern Political Analysis
(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963…1997).
Dahl, Robert A., Polyarchy (New Haven,
CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1971).
Duverger, Maurice, Political Parties
(London: Metheun, 1951, 1976).
Easton, David, The Political System
(New York: Knopf, 1953).
Easton, David, A Systems Analysis of
Political Life (New York: Wiley, 1965).
Easton, David, The Analysis of Political
Structure (New York: Routledge, 1990).
Eulau, Heinz, and Kenneth Prewitt, Labyrinths
of Democracy (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973).
Herring, Pendleton, Group Representative
Before Congress, (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1929).
Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the 20th Century (Norman,
OK: Univ. of Oklahoma Press, 1991).
Lasswell, Harold, Politics:
Who Gets What, When, and How (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936).
Lasswell, Harold, and Abraham Kaplan, Power
and Society: A Framework for
Political Inquiry (New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1950).
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man
(New York: Doubleday, 1960).
Macridis, Roy C., The Study of Comparative
Government (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1955).
Merriam, Charles, The Making of Citizens
(Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1931).
Michels, Robert, Political Parties
(orig. publ. 1915; Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1949).
Moore, Barrington, Social Origins of
Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon, 1966).
Pye, Lucian, Politics, Personality, and
Nation-Building (New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1962).
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1971).
Riker, Willian H., The Theory of
Coalitions (New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 1962).
Sartori, Giovanni, Theory of Democracy
Revisited (2 vols.; Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1987).
Schattschneider, E. E., The Semi-Sovereign
People (New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, 1960).
Simon, H. A., Models of Man
(New York: Wiley, 1957).
Smelser, Neil, Comparative Methods in the
Social Sciences (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976).
Sorauf, Frank J., Perspectives on
Political Science (Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Books, 1966).
Strum, Philippa, and Michael Shmidman, On
Studying Political Science (Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing Co.,
1969).
Verba, Sidney, Elites and the Idea of
Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987).
Wahlke, J., The Politics of Representation
(Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1978).
|