Dr. P.V. Viswanath

 

pviswanath@pace.edu

Home
Bio
Courses
Research
Economics/Finance on the Web
Student Interest

   
  Home/Courses/Articles  
   
 
 
 

At Toys ‘R’ Us, a $200 Million Debt Problem Could Lead to $348 Million in Fees

NY Times, May 11, 2018

 
 

The swift collapse of Toys “R” Us has been particularly painful for the company’s employees, more than 30,000 of whom will lose their jobs.
By Michael Corkery

Last spring, Toys “R” Us, struggling in the face of competition, wanted to refinance about $200 million in debt. A year and a messy bankruptcy later, Toys “R” Us is expected to pay as much as $348 million for the dozens of bankers, lawyers and consultants that tried to fix its problems.

The giant payout, detailed in company documents released on Friday, shows how lucrative corporate bankruptcies can be for professionals, while leaving many workers and creditors with scraps. Toys “R” Us’ swift downfall has been particularly painful for the company’s more than 30,000 employees, who are losing their jobs as the company shuts its doors across the United States in the next few weeks.

The store workers say they will not receive severance, even though many say they were originally promised modest payouts. In the final days, Toys “R” Us is paying many employees for full-time work, but not requiring them to come into the office if they aren’t needed.“This aggravates me so much,” said Tracy Forbes, a manager at a Babies “R” Us store in Phoenix. “These people are getting rich, and we are getting nothing after keeping this company going for 60 years.”

For creditors, it is all about the pecking order. Vendors are fighting to get paid for their toys and landlords are scrambling to find new tenants for the hulking stores that Toys “R” Us is leaving behind. Bankruptcy professionals typically sit near the top and are largely assured of getting paid.

The high cost of bankruptcy has been an issue for years. The fees in the Lehman Brothers case topped $1 billion two years after the investment bank filed the largest corporate bankruptcy case in history and help set off the global financial crisis in 2008.  “The fees have been increasing, and there is no effective means to control them,” said Lynn LoPucki, a bankruptcy professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Companies can choose where they want to file for bankruptcy. And Mr. LoPucki said bankruptcy judges were reluctant to push back on fees, fearing lawyers would choose to file big cases elsewhere. Toys “R” Us, based in Wayne, N.J., filed its Chapter 11 case in federal court in Richmond, Va., which has a reputation for approving large professional fees.

Toys “R” Us bankruptcy lawyers from Kirkland & Ellis said in a court filing last year that they were charging as much as $1,745 an hour in the case. That was 25 percent more than the average highest rate in 10 of the largest bankruptcies in 2017, according to an analysis by The New York Times. Bankruptcy professionals say that working to reorganize or liquidate a company is time-consuming, complicated and intense. Toys “R” Us is made up of multiple corporate entities — in the United States and internationally — that have hired lawyers and advisers. All of that has added up to a big bill. So far, the company said, it has shelled out $108 million on professional fees. It expects to spend as much as $348 million as a result of the bankruptcy, according to the company documents.

Toys “R” Us collapsed quickly, going from a potential turnaround play to a costly liquidation. With cash tight, the company wanted last spring to take some of the pressure off by refinancing about $200 million of its total $5 billion in debt. But when word got out that Toys “R” Us had hired restructuring advisers, the company’s vendors were spooked heading into the crucial Christmas season. By September, Toys “R” Us said it had no choice but to file for bankruptcy.

The company had originally hoped to shed some of its debt and keep operating. But after dismal holiday sales, the Toys “R” Us lenders began to question whether the company had a future and threatened to pull back on financing. In March, the company said it would close hundreds of United States stores and lay off all its workers.

Toys “R” Us problems date to 2005, when the private equity firms Bain Capital and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and the real estate firm Vornado Realty Trust acquired the company in a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout. Saddled with huge debt, Toys “R” Us had a difficult time competing with Walmart and Amazon. Loan payments were sapping cash that it could have spent on updating its cavernous stores and building out its website.

Ms. Forbes’s last day at the Phoenix store is on June 30. The company, she says, will stop contributing to her 401(k) account next week. Ms. Forbes says she is also owed six weeks of vacation, but will not be paid for it. This week, she traveled to Washington D.C. with the labor advocacy group OUR to lobby members of Congress on the need to protect severance in bankruptcy cases. “If we can’t get severance from Toys ‘R’ Us, we have to stop it from happening to someone else,” Ms. Forbes said.

 

 
 

Questions:

  1. Why is bankruptcy so costly? In this case, $200m in debt led to $348m in legal expenses!
  2. There is a priority list of claimholders in bankruptcy. Employees who are owed salaries are high up on that list. Should severance payments be high on that list as well? Would that affect demand for labor? Would that lead to more automation?
  3. Lawyers are those who choose where to file for bankruptcy, and they seem to have an incentive to choose courts that allow expensive legal payouts. How would you suggest fixing this problem, short of legislation? Are there things that the corporation itself can do?
  4. What could Toys'R'Us have done to avoid the unravelling of the firm in bankruptcy?
  5. The company seems to have been a viable ongoing business entity, i.e. worth more than the value of the resources put into it (a positive NPV investments, in other words). Why was there no incentive for anybody to take advantage of this?